Gender Equality In America Essays On Success

Posted on by Nall

In partnership with journalist Maria Shriver, Ascend at the Aspen Institute Executive Director Anne Mosle was asked to join experts and leaders on gender equality to contribute essays to “The Shriver Report,” a special examination of women and poverty in the United States. The report, titled “A Woman’s Nation Pushes Back from the Brink,”  is available for free download for a limited-time only until Jan. 15.

Below is Mosle’s chapter from the report, which discusses findings from Ascend’s recent publication called “Voices for Two-Generation Success.”

Other contributors to the Shriver Report include multi-platinum recording artist Beyonce, New America Foundation President and CEO Anne-Marie Slaughter, Ascend Fellows Dr. Eduardo Padron and Gloria Perez, Aspen ThinkXChange participant Dr. Nadine Burke Harris, and others. Click here to read the chapters in their entirety.

Personal Solutions: Personal Action, Collective Impact: Linking Key Elements of the American Dream — Educational Opportunities, Financial Stability, and Social Capital — to Improve Women’s Lives


Women’s social, political, and financial opportunities have improved dramatically over the past 50 years. In 1967, only 27 percent of mothers were breadwinners or co-breadwinners, but recent data show that in 2010, women were co- or primary breadwinners in two-thirds of American families.

And yet young women coming of age in the new millennium face many complex choices for which there is no clear game plan. So what does a 21st-century road map for stability and opportunity look like? To help girls accelerate the gains they are making in the classroom, financial literacy and emotional development support are key. They have emerged as critical components of a modern girl’s education alongside leadership training, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, or STEM, courses. Today’s “life education” is what girls need to confidently navigate a social terrain where they will constantly assess trade-offs about school, jobs, finances, career, family, marriage, and children.

Many programs and policies have already embraced teaching girls these life education lessons. Some focus on financial literacy skills such as Girls Inc., which provides courses on saving and budgeting for girls in high school and middle school. Others, such as Girls on the Run, help teenagers develop self-esteem and healthy habits through group activities and mentoring. Programs that integrate two-generation approaches and social capital development — such as the Jeremiah Program and the Glen at St. Joseph — are also integrating behavioral classes, such as the habits of healthy relationships and ways to self-regulate and maintain calm in a crisis. Momentum for these kinds of courses is building partly because girls understand that their world will be different from their mothers’ and that they will need to augment their mothers’ advice with these skills.


The adolescents Ascend at the Aspen Institute spoke to were acutely aware that they needed to be equipped to meet the demands of a world where college is mandatory but marriage is not. Their professional ambitions are limitless; their relationship goals focus on finding a partner who will respect them.

Growing up in a deep recession has colored their perspectives; they acknowledge the vitality of trusted relationships and networks. “For a year, my dad and I were homeless,” one girl shared in Denver, “and our family friends from a really long time ago, they let us use their basement as our house for an entire year and endless thanks goes to them. I can’t even begin to describe how lucky we were.”1

Their responses generally underscored a sophistication mixed with deep anxiety: They know college is essential for a better life, but the costs are daunting. As one girl in Denver lamented, “I am going out of state to college and it’s just going to be a struggle. I got a decent scholarship, but I don’t know, because my sister is going next year and then [our] parents are divorced. Money is just a struggle.”2

Girls also expressed a real drive for self-reliance, but a worrying conviction that they are their own greatest liabilities. “I am positive about my future, but you know, there is always still that fear in the back of my mind that I am just going to fail,” one girl shared. “You know everybody has that. Especially once you graduate.”3

Mothers thought self-reliance and independence would equip their daughters for success in the world and even inoculate them from future struggles. As a Chicago mother put it, “Be smart, strong, independent, and not naïve.”4 Both mothers and girls valued respect in their relationships. The sentiment from a Richmond mom was underscored in our conversations with teen girls: “If it’s not healthy, if it’s hindering, it doesn’t need to be a relationship.”5


From their advice, responses, and thoughts, four powerful ways emerged to prepare young girls and boys to create a life of stability and security.

1. Develop confidence, self-reliance, and healthy relationships

What if your anxieties about the future disappeared? “I would be unstoppable.”6

What they told us they need

Voices for Two-Generation Success found that girls identify confidence and self-reliance as core values. Being independent is important; surviving on one’s own is an aspirational goal. Respect in relationships is also a clear, if sometimes elusive, goal of our focus group participants. Both boys and girls cite respect, honesty, trust, and communication as elements that must be present in a healthy relationship.

The mothers we talked to are actively teaching their sons to respect women and advising their daughters to respect themselves. As one Richmond mom said, “If people don’t respect you, you are going to get walked all over.”7

Girls believe that they are in control of their own futures, and that they are the key to their own success. The best advice they say they have received is variations on a similar theme: Believe in yourself, never give up, and be true to yourself.

The app they designed for themselves

“A mirror so that the person using it would have to type in positive things about themselves either physically or mentally each day, something they like about themselves. You set it to tell you something positive about yourself in timed intervals or when you feel bad about yourself. It would make the person using it provide a self-esteem boost coming from themselves.”8

Solutions to tap

Confidence is clearly a skill girls told us they want and need to persist against daunting challenges. Innovative programs are integrating confidence-boosting activities into their approaches. As mentioned earlier, through Girls on the Run, a nonprofit program with chapters across the country, girls in elementary and middle school participate in afterschool running groups that integrate team-building and life coaching.9 The mission of the organization, which started in 1996, is to “inspire girls to be joyful, healthy, and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.”

Conversations to better understand how to have healthy relationships — with oneself and with others — are also at the heart of Start Strong, a partnership between Futures Without Violence and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.10 The program operates in 11 communities across the country, teaching girls and boys in middle school about healthy relationships in order to stop dating violence and abuse before it starts.

Elsewhere, two-generation programs that include lessons on confidence building, such as Eveline’s Sunshine Cottage in Amarillo, Texas — where young mothers live together with their children and participate in parenting groups and self-esteem workshops — have seen their moms flourish.11 In Oregon, The National Crittenton Foundation spearheads a national empowerment program for young women who have experienced significant trauma and abuse to “thrive, build skills, break destructive cycles, and become powerful agents of personal and social change.”12 Within the support of the foundation, many of these women have testified everywhere from the halls of Congress to their local city council meeting to push for better mental health and economic policies.

2. Get as much education as you can

“Because nowadays you need really a college education to have a steady job that could support you.”13

What they told us they need

Young people believe education is essential for success. The more you have, the better your chances are of succeeding. College is a key goal. While they are aware of family members who have jobs or careers without having gone to college, they also know that not having a college degree is a barrier to achieving their dreams.

Girls and boys are optimistic about their futures, yet they all share a common worry: successfully managing the academic and financial demands of college. They are acutely aware of how expensive a college education is and how student loans can lead to high debt. As policymakers debate the necessity of liberal arts education versus more skill- and industry-specific education, teens shared their observations about classmates who are tracked for college and those who clearly are not. Anxious about the need to watch their wallets and balance their time, teens wanted tools to help them manage both. They know that to get into college, they will have to do well in high school — and to finish college, they need a plan to pay for it.

The app they designed for themselves

“A timekeeper based on activities, services, and projects that is also an electronic logbook based on income and expenses. It could help with keeping track of finances and making sure you’re on task time-wise. It would give you key information about your financial strengths and weaknesses and how you can improve spending money and time.”14

Solutions to tap

Making sure girls understand what it takes to go beyond high school and the impact that postsecondary education will have on their earnings potential is central to life education. We can learn from the success of organizations such as the American Association of University Women, or AAUW, a 130-year-old national grassroots organization that has been empowering young women to succeed through a range of programs, including campus leadership trainings and STEM initiatives. AAUW has developed courses that encourage more girls to pursue science and technology careers, such as Tech Trek and Tech Savvy. These courses aim to break down stereotypes surrounding these traditionally male-dominated fields and teach girls that intellectual skills grow over time, regardless of gender.15

Other programs use technology to connect directly to girls’ aspirations, such as Career Girls, an organization dedicated to providing young girls of all income levels and ethnic backgrounds with the academic tools and support they need to achieve their professional aspirations. The program does this by providing “real-world” context for a teenager’s academic studies, specifically through videotaped interviews with positive female role models and a comprehensive collection of easy-to-follow educational resources, all available on the organization’s website.

Young single mothers will need even more support, and we have seen in the two-generation programs we have studied that this type of educational support yields benefits for mother and child. For young single mothers in their teens and early 20s, the Higher Education Alliance of Advocates for Students with Children — which grew out of Endicott College’s Keys to Degrees program — is a two-generation organization that helps young parents stay in school by promoting supportive housing and early childhood education on college campuses around the country.16 These kinds of advocacy organizations are vital to helping young people manage the complexity of college, whether they are struggling to support a family and earn a degree, or simply trying to pay for each semester as they progress through school.

3. Seek mentors and tap networks

“My field hockey coach is amazing; I don’t know what I would do without her. I definitely look up to my coach 24/7.” 17

What they told us they need

The younger and older girls and boys describe narrow support networks consisting of friends, parents, or siblings, and an occasional friend’s parent. Teachers and guidance counselors are essential anchors for young people, and some return to former teachers for advice and support as they get older. As girls increase their participation in sports, coaches also emerge as a critical source of motivation and encouragement. Girls and boys recognize that cultivating trusted relationships — with teachers, coaches, and even community leaders — means having an ear to listen and a shoulder to lean on.

The app they designed for themselves

“An app where you could tell it your problems; it can be anonymous. People can comment on it and not sugarcoat anything but just give you the best advice for that situation. You would use it whenever you have an issue where you can’t really talk to anyone about it. It could help you get through issues and problems whenever you get stuck.”18

Solutions to tap

Research has shown the powerful impact that mentors can have on young people, particularly when those mentors help their mentee to effectively cope with difficulties and express optimism and confidence about their lives.19

The nonprofit Urban Alliance applies this lesson, providing urban young adults with mentors and resources to build their potential through professional careers and higher education. Since 1996, Urban Alliance has served more than 1,200 youth in a year-round internship program, partnering with more than 100 local businesses, and it has developed a curriculum that has been shared with more than 15,000 youth through workshops in the community. The curriculum covers business etiquette and issues, including résumé writing, phone skills, and conflict resolution.20

Programs that introduce young women to leaders can provide teenage girls with needed mentors for their educational success and emotional well-being — and jump-start their networks and budding social capital.

The Links, Incorporated, is a women’s volunteer service organization committed to enriching, sustaining, and ensuring the cultural and economic survival of African Americans. With more than 270 chapters, it sponsors a range of programs that systemically provide support for economic mobility.21 One program encourages members to work with community college students to provide them with mentoring, academic coaching, and other services needed so that they can transfer to one of the historically black colleges and universities to earn a bachelor’s degree.

The founders of Girls Write Now, or GWN, developed a creative writing tutorial program featuring prominent journalists and professionals as volunteers for at-risk high school girls in public schools throughout New York City.22 With academic support, mentoring, and writing lessons, “100% of GWN’s seniors graduate and move on to college — bringing with them portfolios, awards, scholarships, new skills, and a sense of confidence.”23

4. Become market and money savvy

“Saving up. Every time you say you want to go to the movies, you can take that money that you were going to spend and put it in the bank.”24

What they told us they need

Teenagers have spent their adolescence watching their parents — single, married, or in the midst of divorce — struggling with the impact and fallout of the Great Recession. They know how easy it is to find oneself on the precipice of financial instability, and they are determined to build security for themselves and their families.

But those paths lack clear maps: Teenage girls say they are anxious about their ability to make smart financial decisions and need better guidance on how to save, borrow, and negotiate more strategically. They are afraid of mistakes and ending up in debt. While meeting the financial challenge of college without going into debt is one reason why financial literacy and a deeper understanding of money management surfaced loud and clear, girls also voiced a desire to learn how to handle money so that they can be on their own, pay for groceries, buy a car, and be able to budget as an adult. Girls also noted the need to choose and prepare for careers that offered good pay and advancement opportunities.

The app they designed for themselves

“This app would let you decide on a job and tell you what that job would pay you so you can then determine how much you would need for bills, like monthly rent and groceries. It would help you understand how much money you would need to live and the cost of things you need for living. It would teach you what you needed for your future.”25

Solutions to tap

A better understanding of how to save and manage debt is essential knowledge for girls, but so too is the confidence to control one’s own money and, someday, others’ money as corporate leaders or small business owners.

The Girl Scout Research Institute conducted a nationwide survey of girls ages 8 to 17 in 2012 and found that only 12 percent of young girls feel “very confident” when it comes to making financial decisions. The Girl Scouts has strategies, including a Financial Literacy Badge and curriculum, to help girls develop money management skills for themselves and others. Its decades-old Girl Scout Cookie Program, the largest girl-led business in the world, now includes business ethics lessons, goal setting, and people skills courses.26 Encouraging girls to develop entrepreneurial drive, the Girl Scouts also teaches “group money-earning” strategies, including developing car wash and pet-sitting businesses, and has an online video series for girls called “It’s Your Business — Run It!”

There are other innovations to build on for financial lessons in a life education curriculum: For instance, at Girls Inc., the “Economic Literacy” curriculum includes dynamic workshops such as “She’s on the Money!” and “Equal Earners, Savvy Spenders,” which arm young girls with vital financial skills early, such as saving, market investing, and entrepreneurship.27 And Jump$tart, a national advocacy organization that trains teachers how to teach smart money habits to students from kindergarten through high school, hosts conferences on such important issues as identity theft and debt management.28

As we have seen in programs that focus on the whole family — such as FUEL Education, which promotes savings circles and accounts to help high school students and their families to prepare for college and emergencies — a better understanding of finances, budgets, and how to use existing economic supports to meet their family’s needs is essential if a young person is going to push back from the brink.29

Life education can be the link to building a stronger future. As we listen to young women, we also understand more clearly the possibilities and the potential pitfalls of positioning the next generation to thrive. The app ideas that teenagers brainstormed are not simply smart tools for smartphones — they represent the needs of a generation of young people who are not being equipped with the tools, ideas, and practical information to help them navigate the challenges and choices presented to them in the modern world.

This is an excerpt from The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Pushes Back from the Brink, in partnership with the Center for American Progress. Download the full report here for FREE through January 15th.


[1] Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, “Voices for Two-Generation Success: Seeking Stable Futures.”

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] See Girls on the Run, available at

[10] See Futures Without Violence, available at

[11] See Eveline’s Sunshine Cottage, “Application Process, Past Successes,” available at!__application-process–past-successes.

[12] See The National Crittenton Foundation, “Who We Are,” available at

[13] Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, “Voices for Two-Generation Success: Seeking Stable Futures.”

[14] Ibid.

[15] See American Association of University Women, “What We Do: STEM Education,” available at

[16] See Higher Education Alliance of Advocates for Students with Children, available at

[17] Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, “Voices for Two-Generation Success: Seeking Stable Futures.”

[18] Ibid.

[19] Leo B. Hendry and others, “Adolescents’ perceptions of significant individuals in their lives,” Journal of Adolescence 15 (3) (1992): 255–270, available at

[20] See Urban Alliance, “Curriculum Outreach,” available at

[21] See The Links, Incorporated, available at

[22] See Girls Write Now, available at

[23] See Girls Write Now, “Who We Are: Our Story,” available at

[24] Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, “Voices for Two-Generation Success: Seeking Stable Futures.”

[25] Ibid.

[26] See Girl Scouts, “Financial Literacy,” available at

[27] See Girls Inc., available at

[28] See Jump$tart, “Activities and Initiatives,” available at

[29] See FUEL Education, “History,” available at

Women’s labor-force participation in the United States also leveled off in the second half of the 1990s, in contrast to its continued increase in most other countries. Gender desegregation of college majors and occupations slowed. And although single mothers continued to increase their hours of paid labor, there was a significant jump in the percentage of married women, especially married women with infants, who left the labor force. By 2004, a smaller percentage of married women with children under 3 were in the labor force than in 1993.

SOME people began to argue that feminism was not about furthering the equal involvement of men and women at home and work but simply about giving women the right to choose between pursuing a career and devoting themselves to full-time motherhood. A new emphasis on intensive mothering and attachment parenting helped justify the latter choice.

Anti-feminists welcomed this shift as a sign that most Americans did not want to push gender equality too far. And feminists, worried that they were seeing a resurgence of traditional gender roles and beliefs, embarked on a new round of consciousness-raising. Books with titles like “The Feminine Mistake” and “Get to Work” warned of the stiff penalties women paid for dropping out of the labor force, even for relatively brief periods. Cultural critics questioned the “Perfect Madness” of intensive mothering and helicopter parenting, noting the problems that resulted when, as Ms. Friedan had remarked about “housewifery,” mothering “expands to fill the time available.”

One study cautioned that nearly 30 percent of opt-out moms who wanted to rejoin the labor force were unable to do so, and of those who did return, only 40 percent landed full-time professional jobs. In “The Price of Motherhood,” the journalist Ann Crittenden estimated that the typical college-educated woman lost more than $1 million dollars in lifetime earnings and forgone benefits after she opted out.

Other feminists worried that the equation of feminism with an individual woman’s choice to opt out of the work force undermined the movement’s commitment to a larger vision of gender equity and justice. Joan Williams, the founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the ’s Hastings College of the Law, argued that defining feminism as giving mothers the choice to stay home assumes that their partners have the responsibility to support them, and thus denies choice to fathers. The political theorist Lori Marso noted that emphasizing personal choice ignores the millions of women without a partner who can support them.

These are all important points. But they can sound pretty abstract to men and women who are stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to arranging their work and family lives. For more than two decades the demands and hours of work have been intensifying. Yet progress in adopting family-friendly work practices and social policies has proceeded at a glacial pace.

Today the main barriers to further progress toward gender equity no longer lie in people’s personal attitudes and relationships. Instead, structural impediments prevent people from acting on their egalitarian values, forcing men and women into personal accommodations and rationalizations that do not reflect their preferences. The gender revolution is not in a stall. It has hit a wall.

In today’s political climate, it’s startling to remember that 80 years ago, in 1933, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to establish a 30-hour workweek. The bill failed in the House, but five years later the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 gave Americans a statutory 40-hour workweek. By the 1960s, American workers spent less time on the job than their counterparts in and .

Between 1990 and 2000, however, average annual work hours for employed Americans increased. By 2000, the United States had outstripped Japan — the former leader of the work pack — in the hours devoted to paid work. Today, almost 40 percent of men in professional jobs work 50 or more hours a week, as do almost a quarter of men in middle-income occupations. Individuals in lower-income and less-skilled jobs work fewer hours, but they are more likely to experience frequent changes in shifts, mandatory overtime on short notice, and nonstandard hours. And many low-income workers are forced to work two jobs to get by. When we look at dual-earner couples, the workload becomes even more daunting. As of 2000, the average dual-earner couple worked a combined 82 hours a week, while almost 15 percent of married couples had a joint workweek of 100 hours or more.

Astonishingly, despite the increased workload of families, and even though 70 percent of American children now live in households where every adult in the home is employed, in the past 20 years the United States has not passed any major federal initiative to help workers accommodate their family and work demands. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 guaranteed covered workers up to 12 weeks unpaid leave after a child’s birth or adoption or in case of a family illness. Although only about half the total work force was eligible, it seemed a promising start. But aside from the belated requirement of the new Affordable Care Act that be given a private space at work to pump , the F.M.L.A. turned out to be the inadequate end.

Meanwhile, since 1990 other nations with comparable resources have implemented a comprehensive agenda of “work-family reconciliation” acts. As a result, when the United States’ work-family policies are compared with those of countries at similar levels of economic and political development, the United States comes in dead last.

Out of nearly 200 countries studied by Jody Heymann, dean of the school of public health at the , and her team of researchers for their new book, “Children’s Chances,” 180 now offer guaranteed paid leave to new mothers, and 81 offer paid leave to fathers. They found that 175 mandate paid annual leave for workers, and 162 limit the maximum length of the workweek. The United States offers none of these protections.

A 1997 directive prohibits employers from paying part-time workers lower hourly rates than full-time workers, excluding them from pension plans or limiting paid leaves to full-time workers. By contrast, American workers who reduce hours for family reasons typically lose their benefits and take an hourly wage cut.

Is it any surprise that American workers express higher levels of work-family conflict than workers in any of our European counterparts? Or that women’s labor-force participation has been overtaken? In 1990, the United States ranked sixth in female labor participation among 22 countries in the , which is made up of most of the globe’s wealthier countries. By 2010, according to an economic research paper by Cornell researchers Francine Blau and Lawrence Kahn, released last month, we had fallen to 17th place, with about 30 percent of that decline a direct result of our failure to keep pace with other countries’ family-friendly work policies. American women have not abandoned the desire to combine work and family. Far from it. According to the , in 1997, 56 percent of women ages 18 to 34 and 26 percent of middle-aged and older women said that, in addition to having a family, being successful in a high-paying career or profession was “very important” or “one of the most important things” in their lives. By 2011, fully two-thirds of the younger women and 42 percent of the older ones expressed that sentiment.

Nor have men given up the ideal of gender equity. A 2011 study by the Center for Work and Family at found that 65 percent of the fathers they interviewed felt that mothers and fathers should provide equal amounts of caregiving for their children. And in a 2010 Pew poll, 72 percent of both women and men between 18 and 29 agreed that the best marriage is one in which husband and wife both work and both take care of the house.

BUT when people are caught between the hard place of bad working conditions and the rock wall of politicians’ resistance to family-friendly reforms, it is hard to live up to such aspirations. The Boston College study found that only 30 percent of the fathers who wanted to share child care equally with their wives actually did so, a gap that helps explain why American men today report higher levels of work-family conflict than women. Under the circumstances, how likely is it that the young adults surveyed by Pew will meet their goal of sharing breadwinning and caregiving?

The answer is suggested by the findings of the sociologist Kathleen Gerson in the interviews she did for her 2010 book, “The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family.” Eighty percent of the women and 70 percent of the men Ms. Gerson interviewed said they wanted an egalitarian relationship that allowed them to share breadwinning and family care. But when asked what they would do if this was not possible, they described a variety of “fallback” positions. While most of the women wanted to continue paid employment, the majority of men said that if they could not achieve their egalitarian ideal they expected their partner to assume primary responsibility for parenting so they could focus on work.

And that is how it usually works out. When family and work obligations collide, mothers remain much more likely than fathers to cut back or drop out of work. But unlike the situation in the 1960s, this is not because most people believe this is the preferable order of things. Rather, it is often a reasonable response to the fact that our political and economic institutions lag way behind our personal ideals.

Women are still paid less than men at every educational level and in every job category. They are less likely than men to hold jobs that offer flexibility or family-friendly benefits. When they become mothers, they face more scrutiny and prejudice on the job than fathers do.

So, especially when women are married to men who work long hours, it often seems to both partners that they have no choice. Female professionals are twice as likely to quit work as other married mothers when their husbands work 50 hours or more a week and more than three times more likely to quit when their husbands work 60 hours or more.

The sociologist Pamela Stone studied a group of mothers who had made these decisions. Typically, she found, they phrased their decision in terms of a preference. But when they explained their “decision-making process,” it became clear that most had made the “choice” to quit work only as a last resort — when they could not get the flexible hours or part-time work they wanted, when their husbands would not or could not cut back their hours, and when they began to feel that their employers were hostile to their concerns. Under those conditions, Professor Stone notes, what was really a workplace problem for families became a private problem for women.

This is where the political gets really personal. When people are forced to behave in ways that contradict their ideals, they often undergo what sociologists call a “values stretch” — watering down their original expectations and goals to accommodate the things they have to do to get by. This behavior is especially likely if holding on to the original values would exacerbate tensions in the relationships they depend on.

In their years of helping couples make the transition from partners to parents, the psychologists Philip and Carolyn Cowan have found that tensions increase when a couple backslide into more traditional roles than they originally desired. The woman resents that she is not getting the shared child care she expected and envies her husband’s social networks outside the home. The husband feels hurt that his wife isn’t more grateful for the sacrifices he is making by working more hours so she can stay home. When you can’t change what’s bothering you, one typical response is to convince yourself that it doesn’t actually bother you. So couples often create a family myth about why they made these choices, why it has turned out for the best, and why they are still equal in their hearts even if they are not sharing the kind of life they first envisioned.

Under present conditions, the intense consciousness raising about the “rightness” of personal choices that worked so well in the early days of the women’s movement will end up escalating the divisive finger-pointing that stands in the way of political reform.

Our goal should be to develop work-life policies that enable people to put their gender values into practice. So let’s stop arguing about the hard choices women make and help more women and men avoid such hard choices. To do that, we must stop seeing work-family policy as a women’s issue and start seeing it as a human rights issue that affects parents, children, partners, singles and elders. Feminists should certainly support this campaign. But they don’t need to own it.

Continue reading the main story
Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Gender Equality In America Essays On Success”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *